Verbiage. Say What You’re Not Saying.
April 15th, 2010
I am a believer in the power of words. Be it a poetic approach or simply an informative angle. Within my world, words can inspire, confuse, or even distract.
Our verbiage is important. It even helps communicate what we’re not saying. The language that a group of people use often describes that tribe of people. It can express how they dress, the kind of music they listen to, and what they believe.
Here’s an example- In “churchy” circles I’ve begun to hear the terms “churched” and “unchurched”. I understand both sub-cultured terms, but both make me a little unsettled to be honest. What about this perspective? By “churched”, we’re implying that once you are in church (go to church, join a church, yada yada), that we are in the “club”. By using the term “unchurched”, it implies that one is outside of the church (people that don’t attend church on a regular basis).
To me, “churched” means that one is programmed to get the lingo, know the secret handshake, and understand the churchy verbiage. Where “unchurched” can mean that “they” don’t get the lingo, don’t know all the right things to say or do. Kind of makes me want to be an “unchurched” follower of Jesus to be honest.
A few months back, my church decided to change up a little verbiage. We are no longer using the term “member or membership”, and are using “partner or partnership” to describe the people that join us in a covenant fellowship. Personally, I think it was a good move, as we are striving to be aware of our words are not saying.
I will admit that I get hung up on verbiage & the words people use, all-the-while others don’t give it a second thought. You might be thinking “dude, get over it, you know what they mean”. I would say, why NOT change how we speak. Sometimes things unbroken should be broken. They might have more character. Challenging the status quo cultivates growth.
So, may we think, process with an authentic filter, and sense the manner in which we speak, print, publish, and post. What are we not saying?
Chad Jarnagin. Songwriter. Worship Leader. Artist. Pastor. Creative Ideologist. Vocal Coach. Experience Architect. I grew up around Cincinnati, OH and have lived in the Nashville area for over 10 years. I’m the Worship Arts Pastor of Rolling Hills Community Church… 

Good one!
I understand you completely. I frustrate people sometimes because I sit and search for the right words to show exactly what I mean. Words are very important, and our modern society is not always conscious of how we use them.
Great thoughts. I agree with Tim above. The whole reason most words have synonyms is that they all create a different sense of meaning or intention. Understanding your context and purpose is key.
Agreed.
I like your later take on words being important and all, but I think that the words being used, “churched” and “unchurched,” do not mean the secret handshake, etc. They are actually an example of the very point that you are making. That is to say that they are a replacement set for “church member” and “non-members.”
They apparently came into popular use as a sensitive reaction to the inside/outside mentality of the “member” set of descriptions. Those, it was felt, came with the accusatory feelings attached to being seen as an outsider. Being called “un-churched” apparently is less negative a remark, like perhaps you escaped the tainting. In most cases the member set of words came with statements like, “I am a member of a Church.” or “He is not a member of a Church.” The non church attendee had only a negative description.
Yes, there is truth to the description meaning you do not “get the lingo”, but that is exactly what it is supposed to mean. It accurately (within culturally fluid boundaries of course) describes this person as someone who has not been initiated. The truth that there is truth to be explained, secrets to be revealed, etc., is founded in Biblical New Testament truth. Members, or churched folk, generally have experienced the reading, preaching, teaching, and understanding of Biblical truth and have been initiated into a subculture of words with meanings particular to the church scene.
Yes, let’s be sensitive to how we are communicating, but lets communicate. Let’s keep developing our language as long as it helps communicate the truth. That’s why we have been left here, to hold forth the truth for those who need it.
Thanks for all of your input. this is good convo.
Brian, thank you for your perspective. you have a good angle. I think the point could be made that we are ALL people. In or out of church. We are either the Church or we’re not. If “unchurched” equals people that are not in or of the Church, why are they not just “people”? I guess that’s the angle of our lingo.
Being a part of the Church doesn’t mean we’re in the club or initiated. It might (in subcultured circles). Fraternity verbiage does us no good here.
The TRUTH stands alone w/o us adding or taking away w/ our terms and lingo. We should continue to pursue getting out of our own way as we communicate the truth. Be it our language, verbiage, etc. This is actually part of the point I am making here.
Make sense? Just thinking / processing out loud.
Lost or found, Christian or non-Christian, Churched or Unchurched. Jim Henderson wrote a book called “a.k.a. Lost: Discovering Ways to Connect with the People Jesus Misses Most ”
My point is what’s next? There’s always going to be something we use to separate those that know God from those that don’t. Biblically, that’s Jews vs. gentiles. Is it right? I don’t think so but if there isn’t something, then how do you differentiate the two, cause there IS a difference.
You changed members and membership to partner and partnership. How weird is that seeing Homosexuals use that same terminology. Personally, I don’t think that’s a smart move.
However, the point is this. A few years ago they tried to force teachers to quit using a red marker to mark wrong answers and change to purple because it has a less negative reaction. However over time, the purple color will become just as bad as the former red one.
So no matter what you change words to, eventually they’ll end up having the same negative connotation as the previous ones used.
So personally, I say use something and stick with it. Cause no matter the case your still saying the same thing.
Thanks Kevin, for your point. I get your angle.
The message of Jesus IS offensive. Jesus told stories. He spoke to the people in ways that he knew they would understand. NOW, we don’t tend to do that. Saying something and sticking with it has been part of the problem. It’s possible that we’ve been saying the wrong things for a very long time. Sending the wrong message, for a long time. AND, we’re seeing less and less people hearing, responding, and receiving the message of Hope thru the story of the gospel b/c of US (our verbiage, issues, and lack of communication skills) getting in the way. Jesus was an amazing storyteller. We don’t tend to be, unfortunately.
Those that are challenging the status quo will see results. The message of Jesus, not changing. Love God. Love people.
Businesses also use the term partnership. It’s a “buy in” type term.
“To reach people no one else is reaching, we must do things no one else is doing”. I think it should start w/ the way we speak.
Thanks again! Good stuff.
Good post Chad.
I don’t think the problem lies with our verbiage at all. I think it lies with our action. The problem is not what we call each other or the terms we use. It’s how we don’t do what the bible says we should do, that is showing grace and loving one another the way Christ loved us.
I don’t think the problem is verbiage at all. I thinks it’s action. Love is a verb! Or is that too christian cliche? Lol.
Btw, great discussion you got going here.
Thanks guys. I’m with you Kevin. Most of historical issues have been w/ the type of action we do or don’t do. I still don’t think that we can discredit the way we communicate. That too has been a historical issue. Thanks for the thoughts. This has been great!